Inertia
The resistance within organizations to adapt to new circumstances, abandon outdated practices, or embrace necessary changes, often reinforced by existing cultural norms, reward systems, and past successes.
Term Details
Inertia is the resistance to change that builds up in organizations. It stops them from adapting when they need to most.
Understanding Inertia
Think of it like Newton's first law - things at rest stay at rest. Organizations keep doing what they've always done unless something forces them to change. This becomes dangerous when the world shifts around you but you're still stuck in the old ways.
The problem is past success creates the strongest inertia. When something works well, we want to keep it exactly as it is. But in a changing world, what worked yesterday might kill you tomorrow.
Here's the thing - people love learning new skills when they choose to (because they see the upside). But they hate being forced to learn because their old knowledge became worthless. It's like your car - you know when it's old and worth less. But when your knowledge gets old? You rarely notice. You still think it's valuable.
And there's another layer - some people will lose power when things change. They'll fight tooth and nail to keep the status quo because change threatens their position. This makes inertia even stronger and harder to break.
Types of Inertia
Customer Inertia
The moment you get your first customer, the customer learns how to use your solution. That newly created knowledge is a customer intangible and illiquid asset. The customer spent some time (and money), but they cannot get it easily back. Most of the time, they will consider any changes to the component characteristics as undesired, because they render their skills useless and require more investments (learning time).
Key Characteristics:
- Customers have invested in learning your solution
- Changes render existing knowledge useless
- Requires additional investment to adapt
- Creates resistance to innovation
The Good News: Customer inertia goes away when a contract (API) is put in place. You can do whatever you want as long as you don't invalidate customer knowledge!
Vendor Inertia
Vendor inertia is caused by the same mechanism that creates customer inertia, with a few notable differences:
Key Characteristics:
- Asset-heavy operations: Being asset-heavy makes it challenging to change almost by definition because you have a lot of things to sell
- Employee investment: Your employees invest in particular skills and build their position based on them; they may ignore the fact that reality has changed
- Reinforced behaviors: All your incentives may reinforce existing behaviors
- Uncertainty: The fear of the unknown makes people prefer what they have over what they could have
Simon's guide to countering Inertia
Based on research and practice, here are the main categories of inertia and strategies to counter them:
Category | Type | Tactic to counter | Counter points and messaging |
---|---|---|---|
Disruption of Past Norms | Change of business relationship (loss of social capital) | Vendor Management | Right for its time / Past has evolved / Point to other departments / Lead the charge |
Disruption of Past Norms | Loss of existing financial or physical capital | Future Planning | Asset write down / Look to sweat and dump or dispose / Point to savings vs increasing running costs of legacy |
Disruption of Past Norms | Loss of political capital | Modernisation | Emphasis on future agility & efficiency / Make the business aware / Building for the future |
Disruption of Past Norms | Threat to barriers to entry | Unavoidable Change | Already happening in the market |
Transition to the New | Investment in knowledge capital | Training | Cost of acquiring external skills will be high / motivation of staff |
Transition to the New | Cost of acquiring new skillsets | Organisational development | Develop capabilities in-house / use hack days / use conferences / create centres of gravity |
Transition to the New | Investment in new business relationships | Vendor Management | Developing relationships with the right suppliers / understanding the market |
Transition to the New | Changes to governance, management and practices | Awareness of Co-evolution | Practices have to adapt as activities evolve / Point to other past practices |
Agency of the New | Suitability | Weak Signals & prior identification | Examine ubiquity vs certainty |
Agency of the New | Lack of second sourcing options | Supply Chain Management | Use and development of standards, open source options, limit feature use to reduce lock-in, use of abstraction layers |
Agency of the New | Lack of pricing competition | Market Analysis | Single or multiple vendors, examine switching costs, use of brokers |
Agency of the New | Loss of strategic control | Strategic Planning | Examine buyer / supplier relationship, understand the market is commoditising and is no volume operations game |
Business Model | Declining unit value | Awareness of Evolution | Avoid death spiral, Look at alternative opportunities e.g. ecosystem use |
Business Model | Data for Past Success counteracts | Portfolio Management | Risk Mitigation, look at disposal / spin-off |
Business Model | Resistance from rewards and culture | Human Resources | Higher rewards for adaptation, Education, Promote situational awareness |
Business Model | External financial markets reinforce existing models | Analyst Relationships | Spinning a future story |
Measuring Inertia
There is no universal way of measuring inertia, it is necessary to rely on what people think. Understanding the level of inertia can help organizations:
- Identify resistance points before they become critical
- Develop targeted strategies for overcoming specific types of inertia
- Monitor progress in organizational adaptation
- Anticipate challenges in strategic initiatives
Strategic Implications
1. Past Success Creates Future Vulnerability
Organizations that have been successful in the past often struggle most with inertia. Success creates comfort and reinforces existing approaches, making it harder to recognize when change is needed. Also, succssful companies have invested a lot in their success and established certain stakeholder expectations that are difficult to change.
2. Evolution Stages and Inertia
Inertia is particularly problematic during evolution stage transitions:
- Custom-Built to Product: Organizations resist standardization - custom-built solutions usually come with big margins.
- Product to Commodity: Organizations resist industrialization and utility-like operations - adoption, sales incentives and practices are not ready for volume sales
3. Competitive Advantage Through Adaptation
Organizations that can overcome inertia faster than competitors gain significant competitive advantage. The ability to adapt quickly becomes a core competency.
Practical Strategies for Overcoming Inertia
1. Human Resources Approach
- Higher rewards for adaptation: Incentivize change and learning
- Education and training: Build awareness of the need for change
- Promote situational awareness: Help people understand current market conditions
2. Portfolio Management
- Risk mitigation: Diversify to reduce dependence on legacy approaches
- Disposal and spin-off: Actively manage out outdated assets and practices
- Future planning: Invest in emerging capabilities
3. Analyst Relationships
- Spinning a future story: Communicate vision for change to external stakeholders
- Manage expectations: Help markets understand the transition process
4. Awareness of Co-evolution
- Practice adaptation: Recognize that practices must evolve as activities evolve
- Historical perspective: Point to other past practices that have successfully changed
5. Future Planning
- Asset write-down: Accept the reality of legacy asset depreciation
- Sweat and dump: Maximize value from legacy assets while planning disposal
- Cost-benefit analysis: Compare savings vs. increasing running costs of legacy systems
Key Insights
- Inertia is natural but dangerous - It's human nature to resist change, but this resistance can be fatal in dynamic markets
- Past success is the biggest enemy - Organizations that have been successful often struggle most with adaptation
- Multiple types require different approaches - Customer inertia and vendor inertia require different strategies
- Measurement is subjective - A desired change must be idnetified first, then obstacles that from inertia
- Speed of adaptation matters - Organizations that overcome inertia faster gain competitive advantage
Application
When preparing your strategy:
- Identify inertia points: Where in your value chain is resistance to change strongest?
- Map evolution pressure: Which components are under pressure to evolve?
- Assess adaptation capability: How well can your organization respond to change?
- Plan transition strategies: What specific approaches will you use to overcome resistance?
Conclusion
Inertia represents one of the most significant challenges in strategic adaptation. Understanding its causes, types, and counter-strategies is essential for organizations seeking to maintain competitive advantage in dynamic markets. By recognizing inertia early and developing targeted strategies to overcome it, organizations can position themselves for long-term success.
The key is to start with awareness - recognizing that inertia exists and understanding its various forms. From there, organizations can develop specific strategies to overcome resistance and build capabilities for continuous adaptation.
Understanding inertia is crucial for strategic adaptation. Learn more about evolution stages and how they create pressure for change, or explore doctrine principles for building adaptive organizations.
Related Terms
Evolution Stages
The four stages that all components go through: Genesis, Custom Built, Product, and Commodity.
Doctrine
A set of 40 universal principles for strategic success, focusing on situational awareness, user needs, and adaptability in dynamic environments.
Value Chain
The sequence of activities that create value for your customers, from raw materials to final delivery.
Strategy Loop
A mental framework that integrates Sun Tzu's five factors, John Boyd's OODA loop, and two types of 'why' for strategic thinking and leadership.
Coevolution of Practice
A strategic pattern describing how practices evolve alongside changing characteristics of underlying components, requiring new methods as technology shifts.
Gameplay
A catalog of repeatable competitive plays identified through mapping. Apply combinations to remove friction, evolve components, and gain advantage.